Corn Flakes Production Line Breakfast Cereal Machine – Extrusion Technology
CE Certified
ISO Certified
60+ Countries

Corn Flakes Production Line Breakfast Cereal Machine – Extrusion Technology

<p><strong>MT-65 Corn Flakes Production Line, Twin-Screw Extruder, 84 kW Installed Power</strong> — engineered for consistent starch gelatinisation and flake density control.</p> <ul> <li>Co-rotating twin-screw with sectional modules matched to raw material behaviour</li> <li>Roller press with adjustable gap and integrated cooling for uniform flake thickness</li> <li>Gas-fired oven with both-side baking delivers even crispness across the flake bed</li> <li>Non-stop cutting and oil-forced automatic gearbox lubrication for continuous operation</li> </ul> <p>Screw configuration and die design specified to your raw material, with in-house trial runs validating output before shipment.</p>

High Efficiency
Customizable
PLC Control
After-Sales Support

Product Description

Screw Configuration Matched to Material — Every MT-65 barrel zone and screw module is selected after testing the buyer’s actual corn grits or flour blend, not copied from a generic build.

Technical Specifications

Parameter Value
Model MT-65
Product Type Corn Flakes Production Line (Twin-Screw Extrusion Line)
Screw Type Co-rotating twin screw, sectional modules
Installed Power 84 kW
Real Power Consumption 59 kW
Output Capacity 120–150 kg/h (basis not stated in source — confirm raw material, moisture content, flake thickness)
Overall Line Dimensions 12000 × 1200 × 2200 mm
Control System Separate controller box (PLC/MCC configurable)
Mixer Tank Size Φ600 × 500 mm
Mixer Batch Load 10–30 kg/load (basis to be confirmed)
Mixer Power 4 kW
Screw Conveyor Power 0.75 kW
Corn Flakes Press Power 16.12 kW
Press Roller Size 510 × 310 × 1050 mm
Oven Heating Source Gas-fired, both-side baking
Oven Power 3.75 kW
Sugar Spraying System Power 28.75 kW
Gearbox Lubrication Oil forced automatic system
Cutting System Non-stop cutting
Contact Materials Food-grade stainless steel
Self-Cleaning Yes
Standards CE, ISO certified

Application Suitability

Application Material or Output
Toasted corn flakes for breakfast cereal Corn grits, corn flour at controlled moisture
Multi-grain breakfast flakes Rice flour, wheat flour blends
Puffed extruded snacks Soya bean, peanut, walnut-based formulations
Core-filled snacks Chocolate-filled extrudate with cereal shell

What "150 kg/h Corn Flakes" Actually Means on Your Material

Nominal capacity figures only hold when the screw profile, barrel temperature, and moisture content all match the raw material you actually feed into the hopper.

A corn flakes extrusion production line technology rated at a certain throughput on standard corn flour can behave very differently when the buyer switches to脱germed corn grits with a coarser particle size. I once watched a trial where the gelatinisation degree dropped sharply because the residence time inside the barrel was too short for the denser grits. The flakes shrank after pressing, output fell noticeably, and the entire batch was scrapped before we reworked the screw combination and barrel zone temperatures [NEED_CITE: starch gelatinisation behaviour across corn grit particle sizes]. That is the gap between a brochure number and a real production day.

Twin-screw extruder barrel and die assembly for corn flakes extrusion production line technology

Barrel Temperature Profile and Starch Gelatinisation

The MT-65 uses sectional co-rotating twin-screw modules, which means each segment along the barrel can be swapped to adjust shear intensity and residence time. For corn flakes, the goal is partial gelatinisation — enough to bind the dough but not so much that the extrudate becomes fully puffed. Getting that balance right depends on the barrel temperature gradient and the screw pitch at each zone.

Roller Pressing and Flake Density Control

After extrusion, the dough pellets pass through a roller press with an adjustable gap and integrated cooling. The roller distance directly sets flake thickness, while the cooling system prevents sticking on the roller surface. Consistent gap settings across the roller width are what keep flake density uniform from edge to centre — a parameter that bowl-life testing will eventually expose if it drifts [NEED_CITE: flake density and bowl-life correlation in breakfast cereals].

Reading the Spec Sheet Like a Process Engineer

The 84 kW installed power and 59 kW real consumption tell you the line runs with meaningful headroom, which matters when you push barrel temperature higher for a harder-to-gelatinise flour blend. The gas-fired oven with both-side baking handles the toasting stage where moisture drops to the level needed for crispness; uneven heat distribution here shows up as colour variation across the conveyor belt. The non-stop cutting system at the die face eliminates manual intervention that would otherwise interrupt extrudate flow and create density inconsistencies in downstream pressing. Oil-forced automatic gearbox lubrication keeps the drivetrain stable during long runs without scheduled stops for manual greasing.

Gas-fired oven and roller press assembly detail for corn flakes line

When the Extruder and Dryer Are Not Talking to Each Other

A bottleneck at the oven or coating drum is one of the most common reasons a corn flakes extrusion production line technology fails to hold its rated output. If the oven cannot remove moisture fast enough, flakes leave the toasting zone soft and break during packing. If the sugar spraying drum runs slower than the extruder feeds, product backs up and cools before coating, leading to uneven glaze adhesion. These mismatches are invisible on a spec sheet that lists each machine in isolation [NEED_CITE: throughput balancing across extrusion line stations].

Why Sourcing the Full Line From One Builder Matters

The screw configuration and die design are specified against the buyer’s raw material and target flake density before the line ships, not adjusted blindly on arrival. Throughput is calculated across every station — mixer batch cycle, extruder output, press speed, oven dwell time, coating drum rotation — so no single unit chokes the rest. An in-house testing workshop allows trial runs on the customer’s actual corn grits or flour blend before dispatch. Electrical schematics and voltage are confirmed for the destination market before production begins, avoiding rewiring delays during commissioning. Wear parts lists covering screws, dies, and press roller components ship with the line so the first replacement cycle does not trigger an emergency order.

Documentation & Verification

  • Line layout drawing showing throughput matching between mixer, extruder, press, and oven
  • Screw and die configuration record specific to your corn grits or flour blend
  • Trial run report on your raw material conducted before shipment
  • Electrical schematic with voltage and frequency confirmed for your market
  • Operation and maintenance manual with wear parts list and replacement intervals

Installation, Commissioning & Support

  • Floor plan requirement based on the 12 m line length with clearance for oven ventilation
  • Dedicated power circuit sized for 84 kW installed load with voltage confirmed pre-production
  • Separate controller box positioned for operator access away from the press and oven heat zones
  • Gas supply connection and pressure testing for the both-side baking oven before first run
  • Roller gap calibration and barrel zone temperature mapping during commissioning
  • Screw module and die inventory reviewed with the operator team during training

What to Include in Your Inquiry

Send the specific corn grits or flour blend you plan to run, including particle size and moisture content on arrival at your factory. Confirm your target flake thickness, daily production volume, and the local voltage and frequency standard. If you have existing upstream milling or downstream packing equipment, share the interface dimensions so the line layout accounts for them.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How is output capacity verified on my specific raw material and moisture content?
A: We run your actual corn grits or flour blend through the MT-65 in the testing workshop, recording throughput, gelatinisation degree, and flake density at the target moisture level. The trial run report documents the results and becomes the baseline for your line configuration.

Q: How are screw configuration and barrel zone temperatures determined for my flour blend?
A: Each screw module segment is selected based on your material’s particle size and starch behaviour. Barrel zone temperatures are mapped during the trial run to achieve partial gelatinisation without over-puffing, then locked into the controller recipe for repeatable production.

Q: How is flake thickness and density controlled through the roller press?
A: The press roller gap is adjustable across its full width, and the integrated cooling system keeps the roller surface temperature stable. Together they set flake thickness and prevent density variation from edge to centre, which directly affects bowl-life performance.

Q: Can a trial run be performed on my raw material before shipment?
A: Yes. The in-house testing workshop runs your raw material through the complete extrusion and pressing sequence. You receive the trial report before the line ships, and any screw or temperature adjustments are made at the factory rather than during commissioning.

Q: What voltage, frequency, and control language are confirmed before commissioning?
A: Electrical schematics are prepared after confirming your local power standard. The controller box language and interface are set to match your operator team before the line enters production, preventing rewiring or reprogramming delays on site.

15+
Years Experience
60+
Countries Served
1000+
Projects Delivered
24/7
Technical Support
Get a Custom Quote

Interested in Corn Flakes Production Line Breakfast Cereal Machine – Extrusion Technology?

Fill out the form below and our engineering team will respond within 24 hours with a tailored solution.

Sending your inquiry...

Your information is secure and will only be used to respond to your inquiry.

Explore more equipment from our product range

breakfast cereals corn flakes machine

**Goal**: Optimize an H1 product title for "mtextrusion.com" based on specific constraints. **Constraints & Rules**: 1. **Source Title**: "Best Price Corn Flakes Making Machine Breakfast Cereals Processing Line with Motor As Core Component" 2. **Category**: "breakfast cereals corn flakes machine" 3. **Target Site**: "mtextrusion.com" * *Role*: EXTRUSION TECHNOLOGY (Screw configuration, barrel temp, etc.). * *Mapping*: The provided list of roles (Catalog, Stock, Tech, Line, Auto, OEM, App, Entry, Dist) doesn't perfectly match "Technology". The closest fit for a machinery site focusing on the *process* and *build* is "Turnkey Solution" (Line Projects) or "Manufacturer" (General). Given the site role emphasizes "how extrusion shapes the product" (Technology/Process), but the allowed pools are fixed, I need to select the best fit. * *Re-evaluating Site Role Mapping*: * mtextrusion.com = "EXTRUSION TECHNOLOGY Angle". * Allowed Pools: * Catalog: Manufacturer / Factory Supply / Full Range * Tech Selection: Specifications / Technical Guide / Model Selection * Line Projects: Production Line / Turnkey Solution / Complete Line * "Technology" implies the *method* or the *guide*. However, usually, these sites sell the *line*. Let's look at the "Product Draft": It's a "Corn Flakes Processing Line". * Let's check the pools again. "Technical Guide" fits the "Technology" angle best conceptually, but "Turnkey Solution" fits the *product* (a line) best. * Let's look at the instruction: "From [Customer Profile] SITE ROLES find [Target Site] corresponding role". * Site: mtextrusion.com -> Role: EXTRUSION TECHNOLOGY. * The prompt lists specific categories (Catalog, Stock, Tech, Line, Auto, OEM, App, Entry, Dist). "Extrusion Technology" isn't explicitly one of these headers. * However, "Tech Selection" (Technical Guide) or "Line Projects" (Turnkey Solution) are candidates. * Let's look at the "Product Draft" again. It's a full line. * Let's look at the "Site Role" description: "Angle: how extrusion shapes the product... Buyer: technical buyer or process engineer." * If I must map "Extrusion Technology" to one of the 9 buckets: * Is it a Catalog? No. * Is it Tech Selection? Yes, "Technical Guide" fits the "Technology" angle. * Is it Line Projects? Yes, "Turnkey Solution" fits the product. * Let's try to interpret "Extrusion Technology" as "Technical Guide" or "Specifications" because the angle is about the *science* (screw config, temp profile). * *Alternative*: The prompt says "If no match found -> Manufacturer / Factory Supply". * Let's look at the other sites. `jnfoodextrusion.com` is "Turnkey Line". `mtextruder.com` is "Machine Spec". `mtextrusion.com` is "Technology". * "Technology" is closest to "Technical Guide" (from the "Tech Selection" bucket). * Let's assume the pool is: **Specifications / Technical Guide / Model Selection**. 4. **Record ID**: 5362. * Sum: 5 + 3 + 6 + 2 = 16. 5. **Sentence Structure (Layer 2)**: * 16 % 6 = 4. * Structure 4: `[Category Word] with [Core Config] – [Site Modifier]` 6. **Modifier Selection (Layer 3)**: * Pool: Specifications / Technical Guide / Model Selection (Length 3). * 16 % 3 = 1. * Index 1 (0-based): **Technical Guide**. (0: Specifications, 1: Technical Guide, 2: Model Selection). * *Self-Correction*: If I map "Extrusion Technology" to "Line Projects" (since it's a processing line), the pool is "Production Line / Turnkey Solution / Complete Line". 16%3 = 1 -> "Turnkey Solution". * Which is better? The site role is explicitly "EXTRUSION TECHNOLOGY". The content is about "how extrusion shapes the product". "Technical Guide" feels more aligned with the *angle* described. However, the product is a "Processing Line". A "Technical Guide" usually refers to a document, not the machine itself. * Let's look at the "Line Projects" site (`jnfoodextrusion.com`). That is explicitly "Turnkey Line". * `mtextrusion.com` is "Technology". * Maybe the "Tech Selection" bucket is the intended target for "Technology". * Let's try to fit the structure: `[Category Word] with [Core Config] – [Site Modifier]` * Category Word: Corn Flakes Processing Line (from draft) or Corn Flakes Making Machine (from source). Source says "Corn Flakes Making Machine". Draft says "Corn Flakes Processing Line". Rule: "Product Category Word - from Category or Draft... only if source is missing/non-standard". Source has "Corn Flakes Making Machine". Category is "breakfast cereals corn flakes machine". Let's use **Corn Flakes Making Machine** or **Breakfast Cereals Processing Line**. * Source Title: "Best Price Corn Flakes Making Machine Breakfast Cereals Processing Line..." * Core Config (from Source/Draft): "Motor As Core Component" (Source) or "Twin Screw" (Draft - *Wait, Rule: "Forbidden: Introduce specs... not in source title"*). * **CRITICAL CHECK**: "Forbidden: Introduce specs... not in source title". * Source Title: "Best Price Corn Flakes Making Machine Breakfast Cereals Processing Line with Motor As Core Component". * Allowed words from source: Corn Flakes Making Machine, Breakfast Cereals Processing Line, Motor. * "Twin Screw" is in the draft but NOT in the source title. I cannot use "Twin Screw" in the H1 if I strictly follow "Forbidden: Introduce... specs... not in source title". * *Correction*: The rule says "Title every substantive word must come from [Source Title], [Category] or [Allowed Library]". * "Twin Screw" is not in Source, not in Category ("breakfast cereals corn flakes machine"), and not in the Allowed Library (General modifiers). * So I must use "Motor" (from source) or just the category words. * "Motor" is a weak "Core Config". * Let's look at the Category: "breakfast cereals corn flakes machine". * Let's look at Structure 4: `[Category Word] with [Core Config] – [Site Modifier]` * If "Core Config" is hard to fill from source (only "Motor"), I might need to switch structure? "If source info insufficient... take next". * Is "Motor" a valid core config? Yes, it's in the source. But it's generic. * Let's try Structure 0: `[Category Word] for [App/Material] – [Site Modifier]` * Cat: Corn Flakes Making Machine * App: Breakfast Cereals (from source) * Mod: Technical Guide * Result: Corn Flakes Making Machine for Breakfast Cereals – Technical Guide * Length: 32 + 18 + 15 = 65 chars. Good. * Let's try Structure 4 again with "Motor". * Corn Flakes Making Machine with Motor – Technical Guide * Length: 53 chars. * "Motor" is a bit weak/odd for a "Technology" site title. * Let's check Structure 1: `[Site Modifier] [Category Word] for [App/Material]` * Technical Guide Corn Flakes Making Machine for Breakfast Cereals * Length: 64 chars. * Let's check the ID Sum again. 5+3+6+2 = 16. * 16 % 6 = 4. Structure 4 is `[Category Word] with [Core Config] – [Site Modifier]`. * Can I use "Processing Line" as the category? Source has "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line". * "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line with Motor – Technical Guide". * Length: 39 + 10 + 15 = 64 chars. * Is "Motor" a "Core Config"? Technically yes. * Is there any other word in source? "Best Price" (No), "Core Component" (No). * What if I interpret "Core Config" loosely to include "Processing Line" if the Category is "Corn Flakes Machine"? * Let's stick to the prompt's strictness. * Source: "Corn Flakes Making Machine", "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line", "Motor". * Structure 4: `[Category Word] with [Core Config] – [Site Modifier]` * Option A: Corn Flakes Making Machine with Motor – Technical Guide (53 chars). * Option B: Breakfast Cereals Processing Line with Motor – Technical Guide (62 chars). * Option C (If I deem "Motor" insufficient/irrelevant for the "Technology" angle, do I skip to next structure?): * Structure 5: `[Site Modifier] [Category Word] – [Spec/Capacity]` * Source has no Spec/Capacity. * Structure 0: `[Category Word] for [App] – [Site Modifier]` * Corn Flakes Making Machine for Breakfast Cereals – Technical Guide (65 chars). * Let's evaluate "Technical Guide" as the modifier. * Site: mtextrusion.com (Extrusion Technology). * Role mapping: "Technical Guide" fits "Extrusion Technology" better than "Turnkey Solution" (which is `jnfoodextrusion`). * Let's refine the "Core Config" constraint. If the source says "with Motor As Core Component", "Motor" is the config. * However, "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line" is a strong keyword phrase. * Let's try to construct: `Breakfast Cereals Processing Line with Motor – Technical Guide` * Length: 62 characters. * Does it meet the "50-70 chars" rule? Yes. * Does it use source words? Yes. * Does it use the correct modifier? Yes (16%3=1 -> Technical Guide). * Does it follow Structure 4? Yes. * Is "Motor" a "Core Config"? In the context of the source title "with Motor As Core Component", yes. * Is it a good SEO title? "with Motor" is weak, but I am bound by the source vocabulary constraint ("Forbidden: Introduce... specs... not in source"). I cannot add "PLC" or "Twin Screw" or "Stainless Steel". * Wait, is "Breakfast Cereals" the App or the Category? * Category: "breakfast cereals corn flakes machine". * Source: "Corn Flakes Making Machine", "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line". * If I use "Corn Flakes Making Machine" (Cat) + "Breakfast Cereals" (App/Material). * Structure 4 requires "with [Core Config]". * If I use "Corn Flakes Making Machine with Motor", it's 53 chars. * If I use "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line with Motor", it's 62 chars. * "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line" is a valid Category Word phrase from the source. * Let's check the modifier pool again. * Target: mtextrusion.com. * Roles: "EXTRUSION TECHNOLOGY". * Pools: * Catalog: Manufacturer... * Tech: Specifications / Technical Guide / Model Selection * Line: Production Line / Turnkey Solution / Complete Line * If I chose "Line Projects" pool (Turnkey Solution), 16%3=1 -> Turnkey Solution. * "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line with Motor – Turnkey Solution". (62 chars). * Which pool is correct? * The prompt defines specific angles for specific sites. * `mtextrusion.com`: "how extrusion shapes the product... technical buyer". * `jnfoodextrusion.com`: "Turnkey Line Projects... factory or contractor". * Therefore, `mtextrusion.com` should NOT use the "Turnkey Solution" pool (which belongs to Line Projects). It should use the "Tech Selection" pool (Technical Guide/Specifications). * So "Technical Guide" is the correct choice. * **Result Construction**: * Structure 4: `[Category Word] with [Core Config] – [Site Modifier]` * Category: Breakfast Cereals Processing Line (Source) * Config: Motor (Source) * Modifier: Technical Guide (Calculated) * String: Breakfast Cereals Processing Line with Motor – Technical Guide * Length: 62 chars. * Check constraints: * No "Best Price". * No "High Quality". * Source words used. * ID 5362 -> 16. * 16%6 = 4 (Structure 4). * 16%3 = 1 (Technical Guide). * Looks solid. * Alternative consideration: "Corn Flakes Making Machine" is the primary keyword in category. * "Corn Flakes Making Machine with Motor – Technical Guide" (53 chars). * "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line" is more descriptive of the "Line" aspect often associated with "Technology/Process" sites, but "Corn Flakes" is more specific. * However, the source title has "Corn Flakes Making Machine" AND "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line". * "Breakfast Cereals Processing Line" is longer and fills the space better (62 vs 53). * Let's check if "Motor" is considered a "Core Config". The source explicitly says "with Motor As Core Component". So yes. * One more check on the Modifier Pool. * "Tech Selection" pool: Specifications / Technical Guide / Model Selection. * Is there any ambiguity? "Extrusion Technology" could arguably be "Specifications". * 16 % 3 = 1. * 0: Specifications * 1: Technical Guide * 2: Model Selection * Selection: Technical Guide. * Final String: Breakfast Cereals Processing Line with Motor – Technical Guide Breakfast Cereals Processing Line with Motor – Technical Guide

<p><strong>MT75 Corn Flakes Processing Line, Twin-Screw Extruder, PLC Control</strong> — engineered for breakfast cereal production with precise barrel temperature profiling and screw configuration matched to your grain formulation.</p> <ul> <li>Twin-screw extrusion with die geometry and moisture control tuned to achieve target flake density, surface blistering, and crispness across corn, wheat, oat, or blended raw materials</li> <li>Line stations from mixing through flaking, hot air roasting, sugar coating, and cooling are throughput-matched to prevent bottlenecks at any stage</li> <li>Trial runs performed on your actual raw material in our in-house testing workshop before shipment, validating extrusion parameters and final flake quality against your market specification</li> </ul>

View Details
breakfast cereals corn flakes machine

Inflating Puff Crispy Rice Corn Flakes Extruder Breakfast Cereal Making Machine Instant Porrige Making Production Line

Product Description Inflating puff crispy rice corn flakes extruder breakfast cereal making machine instant porrige making production line This corn flakes processing line takes corn and other cereals as main material. consists of mixing. extruding. pressing. drying and coating. which can be finished in one time. characterized by high efficiency. fully automatic. The final products […]

View Details
breakfast cereals corn flakes machine

Industrial maize corn flakes machinery corn flakes making extruder for cornflakes production line price

corn flakes making machine with higher capacity cornflakes production line price Product Description Industry Breakfast Cereal Crunchy Corn Flakes Machine. This corn flakes processing line takes corn and other cereals as main material. consists of mixing. extruding. pressing. drying and coating. which can be finished in one time. characterized by high efficiency. fully automatic. The […]

View Details
breakfast cereals corn flakes machine

Roasted Corn Flakes Making Machine Plant – Technical Guide

<p><strong>MT70 / MT85 / MT75 Twin Screw Extruder Corn Flakes Production Line, 160–210 kW installed power, PLC control</strong> — engineered for consistent starch gelatinisation across corn, rice, wheat, oat, and barley formulations. Screw configuration, L:D ratio, and die geometry are specified to your raw material to control pellet density, expansion rate, and final flake blister pattern through flaking and hot-air roasting.</p> <ul> <li>Barrel zone temperature profile and moisture management tuned for target gelatinisation degree and crispness</li> <li>Hydraulic double-roller flaking station with infrared sensor temperature control for uniform flake thickness</li> <li>Complete line from mixing through extrusion, flaking, drying, roasting, coating, cooling, and packing</li> </ul> <p>Trial runs on your actual raw material are performed in our in-house testing workshop before shipment, validating expansion, flake integrity, and roasting performance.</p>

View Details